Autopano video pro 2 vs autopano video software#
Autopano video pro 2 vs autopano video free#

We used text files on our SD cards to indicate which card corresponded with which camera.

We labeled our cameras to keep everything organized.

We bought this 8-port USB hub so we could charge the GoPros without taking them out of the rig.

We also set ourselves up for success with some simple hacks: We picked up this 7-camera 360 rig from 360 Heroes. The 360 player is a beta feature, and is best viewed in Chrome. Here’s the video we made to launch it internally! It's just a question of matching the requirements to the product.“After a few goes at stitching footage from 14 cameras, we shifted to a simpler, non-3D setup that required half of the cameras.”ĭuring a recent Hackathon, we created a beta version of a 360 Wistia video player. But for most cases these two will do the job. No doubt there are circumstances when another product would be called for.

Autopano video pro 2 vs autopano video free#

My point was that for probably at least 95% of the pans I've seen here, a free product like ICE or an included product like merge to Panorama in LR 6 - will do the job quickly and easily. numerical control works well for processing CGI pano data.output options include immersive pano (it makes a little webpage).

vertical and horizontal alignment control points.

easy selective masking within the same environment, of subject movement (people walking around within the overlap area of two adjacent frames, for example).

integrate HDR bracket and pano stitch in one.

can analyse and optimise for vignetting and distortion.

Other convenient provisions of PTGui include: For this I use Pano2vrīut for everything else - rows and grids - I have been using ICE and LR 6 merge to panorama for years with no issues whatsoever. I do 360 work for my brother who does aerial 360s from his drones. I think we can reasonably treat 360 pans as a different animal. I have never had the 'need to do it over' when using PTGui, because the control point editor has enabled me to manually correct it simply and quickly.

Autopano video pro 2 vs autopano video software#

I'd hate to take a series of shots where the stitching software was unable to stitch correctly, then NOT give you the ability to correct it with a decent control point editor. None of the aforementioned software, other than PTGui provides an intuitive control point editor.

This is where a decent control point editor becomes invaluable. This may be true if you're doing basic stitching (which the OP is enquiring about), but NOT if you're doing 360/180 pans (especially if your including the Nadir as part of the stitch).Ī correctly aligned and positioned nodal point will help avoid misaligned stitches, but not eliminate them. 'If your program is bawling for control points, you've blown the taking of the series and you need to do it over' If your program is bawling for control points, you've blown the taking of the series and you need to do it over.īottom line, I would try ICE and see if you run into any limitations which would justify the purchase of either of the two now very overpriced pano programs. Control point editing is a complete non issue for me. Autopano Giga for even more money and PTGui Pro have masking, which can come in handy once in a great while.

An exception would be HDR panos, available with APP and PTGUI Pro where you can have the program spit out two or three layers to combine in PS or Photomatix, or exposure blend in program, so there's that.Īutopano Pro has an easy to use interface and is without any doubt the best stitcher of problematic series, a real garbage mouth. A marquee feature is Autocomplete, which fills in the voids. Microsoft ICE is free and hard on the heels of the two bigs. At this point I feel sorry for any landscape photog not using CC. As an important bonus, the stitch is a massive DNG which will take heavy shadow and highlight correction. A really nice time saver not to have to pass huge tiffs back and forth. I do a boatload of panos and like most pano shooters I'm extremely fussy. It's what I'm using almost exclusively now. Lightroom's pano assembly works really well and has Boundary Warp, which fills in the voids on the ends of the pano without needing to Transform>Warp in Photoshop. I have owned and used both Autopano Pro and PTGui Pro for years, but I think that their era of dominance is probably coming to an end, owing to free/included competitors.